TPC Staff
The Palestine Chronicle / August 14, 2026
Iran reportedly derailed a US-backed plan for Syrian forces to enter Lebanon and target Hezbollah by threatening a major military response inside Syria.
Iran thwarted a US-backed plan for Syrian military intervention in Lebanon after delivering a sweeping warning to Damascus that such an operation could trigger military action across Syria, according to a report carried by Al-Mayadeen on Thursday.
Al Mayadeen attributed the information to U News, whose account was also subsequently reported by The Times of India, and other news outlets.
According to the report, the proposed Syrian operation was being prepared at the request of the United States and would have involved military action inside Lebanon, including against Hezbollah’s infrastructure.
Tehran reportedly communicated its warning to Damascus through Turkey, saying that any Syrian military entry into Lebanese territory would be met by the activation of multiple fronts inside Syria and along its borders.
The central claims regarding the proposed operation and Iran’s response have not been independently confirmed by the governments involved.
More than 100 targets
According to Al-Mayadeen’s account of the U News report, Iran’s warning included the threat of a large-scale missile attack against more than 100 strategic targets in Syria.
The first wave would reportedly begin in Damascus, with the Syrian presidential palace among the potential targets.
Additional details indicated that Tehran threatened to activate multiple pressure points across Syria, including along the Syrian-Iraqi border, in Homs, the coastal region and areas near Aleppo.
The warning was reportedly not confined to Damascus.
Turkey, Iraq, Qatar and Saudi Arabia were also informed that a Syrian military operation against Hezbollah could expand into a much broader regional confrontation centered inside Syria.
According to Al Mayadeen, the warning prompted regional actors to reassess the potential costs of the scenario, particularly given Syria’s vulnerability to renewed internal and regional warfare.
The report characterized Tehran’s intervention as having transformed a military option that could be promoted by Washington into a potentially high-cost regional confrontation.
Tripoli and Hezbollah’s missiles
The reported Syrian operation included plans extending from northern Lebanon to the Beqaa Valley.
According to U News, the proposed scenario envisioned declaring the northern Lebanese city of Tripoli an area of Syrian influence.
The military component would reportedly target Hezbollah’s missile infrastructure in the Bekaa Valley, seeking to force the movement either to retreat or accept new security arrangements.
Al Mayadeen reported that Hezbollah did not view the proposed intervention as an isolated Syrian initiative.
Instead, the movement reportedly considered it part of a wider US-Israeli campaign aimed at dismantling the infrastructure of the Lebanese resistance from the east following Israel’s failure to achieve a decisive military outcome from the south.
UAE ready to finance operation
The U News account also pointed to significant disagreements among regional governments over the proposed intervention.
According to Al-Mayadeen, the United Arab Emirates expressed enthusiasm for financing a Syrian military operation in Lebanon and was prepared to cover fighters’ salaries and combat expenses.
Saudi Arabia reportedly did not oppose an intervention conducted within arrangements that would weaken Hezbollah, but sought to avoid a scenario that could ignite a wider regional confrontation.
Qatar, meanwhile, reportedly rejected the proposal.
Iraq also opposed a Syrian military expansion into Lebanon, according to the report.
Iraqi intelligence chief Hamid al-Shatri reportedly travelled to Damascus and informed Syrian officials that Baghdad rejected any Syrian military advance into Lebanese territory.
Wider US-Israeli pressure
The reported plan comes amid growing pressure on Hezbollah and attempts to reshape Lebanon’s political and security landscape.
According to Al-Mayadeen, Hezbollah viewed the potential Syrian operation as one component of a broader US-Israeli regional strategy rather than a bilateral dispute between Damascus and the Lebanese movement.
US President Donald Trump has repeatedly raised Syria as a potential source of pressure on Lebanon, while Tom Barrack, US ambassador to Turkey and Washington’s special envoy for Syria and Iraq, previously invoked what he described as Lebanon’s possible “return to Bilad al-Sham.”
(Al-Mayadeen, U News)
