HRW: Israel commits crimes of apartheid and persecution

Palestinians protest against Israel%u2019s occupation in the West Bank city of Al-Khali-Hebron (Ryan Rodrick Beiler - ActiveStills)

Maureen Clare Murphy

The Electronic Intifada  /  April 27, 2021

The International Criminal Court should investigate Israeli officials “implicated in the crimes against humanity of apartheid or persecution,” Human Rights Watch says in a report released on Tuesday.

In its paradigm-shifting study, the New York-based group calls for an approach centered on human rights and accountability rather than the long moribund “peace process” that has been the prevailing framework for decades.

Human Rights Watch has now joined a growing consensus finding that “Jewish supremacy” – in the words of the human rights group B’Tselem – is Israel’s “single organizing principle.”

Israel has “pursued an intent to maintain the domination of Jewish Israelis over Palestinians throughout the territory it controls,” Human Rights Watch concludes.

In the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip, “the intent has been coupled with systematic oppression of Palestinians and inhumane acts committed against them.”

The combination of these three elements “amount to the crime of apartheid,” the group adds.

UN member states should establish an international commission of inquiry to investigate “systematic discrimination and repression based on group identity” in both the occupied Palestinian territories and Israel, Human Rights Watch urges.

Palestinian human rights groups such as Al-Haq have already called for “a fact-finding mission into Israel’s apartheid regime and full international cooperation with the International Criminal Court.”

The UN “has failed for decades” to investigate Israel for perpetrating the crime of apartheid, the Palestinian Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions National Committee observed earlier this year.

The committee said that the so-called peace process towards a two-state solution has only allowed Israel to “continue its longstanding practice” of annexing Palestinian territory.

Human Rights Watch has come to a similar conclusion.

The group notes that “many European and other states have built close ties with Israel, while supporting the ‘peace process.’” That support has involved building the capacity of the Palestinian Authority and occasionally making mild criticism of Israel’s abuses against Palestinians.

This approach “overlooks the deeply entrenched nature of Israeli discrimination and repression of Palestinians,” the rights group argues.

“Serious human rights abuses” are minimized and treated as “temporary symptoms of the occupation that the ‘peace process’ will soon cure.”

The peace process paradigm – notably pushed by the UN secretary-general and his envoy – has made it easy for states to resist accountability and has allowed “apartheid to metastasize and consolidate,” Human Rights Watch adds.

States should “stop assessing the situation through the prism” of a hypothetical future peace process “and focus instead on the longstanding reality on the ground that shows no signs of abating,” the group says.

Drive to preserve a Jewish majority

Israel’s transfer of its civilian population into the West Bank – a violation of international law – since 1967 gives lie to the “widely held” assumption that its military occupation is only temporary.

In both the occupied territories and within its boundaries, Israel has sought to “maximize the land available for Jewish communities and largely confine Palestinians to dense population centers,” according to Human Rights Watch.

“Laws, policies and statements by leading Israeli officials make plain that the objective of maintaining Jewish control over demographics, political power and land has long guided government policy.”

Achieving this objective has entailed dispossessing Palestinians of their land. Israel has also imposed myriad movement restrictions, geographically fragmented the West Bank and Gaza and has “subjugated Palestinians by virtue of their identity to varying degrees of intensity.”

“In certain areas,” Human Rights Watch adds, “these deprivations are so severe that they amount to the crimes against humanity of apartheid and persecution.”

The report focuses on Israel’s policies exercised in the territories under its physical control but recognizes their implications for the rights of Palestinian refugees.

Human Rights Watch observes that as part of Israel’s drive to “preserve a Jewish majority,” Jewish citizens of other countries are guaranteed the right to residency and to gain citizenship in Israel.

Palestinian refugees and their descendants languishing in refugee camps meanwhile are prohibited by Israel from residing in their homeland and exercising their right to return as enshrined in international law.

In its report, which exceeds 200 pages, Human Rights Watch details these Israeli policies and their harm done to Palestinians but does not identify individuals responsible.

The International Criminal Court – which launched a probe of international crimes perpetrated in the West Bank and Gaza last month – prosecutes individuals, not states.

Human Rights Watch calls on UN member states to establish an international commission of inquiry to identify individuals credibly implicated in Israel’s crimes of apartheid and persecution.

“The inquiry’s mandate should be sufficiently broad to cover the role of other actors, including companies and officials of other states,” the group urges.

The report recommends that states impose “targeted sanctions, including travel bans and asset freezes” against implicated officials and “entities.”

Arms sales and military aid to Israel should be conditioned on that state “taking concrete and verifiable steps towards ending” the crimes of apartheid and persecution.

Calls on US and EU

Human Rights Watch specifically calls on the US government to adopt this measure and assess the use of weapons and equipment, whether of US origin or purchased with US funds, in serious violations of international law.

A new US congressional bill would require the government to certify whether Israel is breaking the prohibition on using US funds to violate human rights.

The proposed legislation would also prohibit US funds from aiding Israel’s crimes of military detention and the abuse and torture of detained Palestinian children, among other crimes.

In a forceful rebuke of the bill, three-quarters of the House of Representatives have signed a letter rejecting conditions on the $3.8 billion in assistance the US provides to Israel each year.

US President Joe Biden has also rejected conditions on assistance to Israel, deeming it “irresponsible.”

As for the EU, Human Rights Watch calls on the 27-member bloc to assess “the implications for EU and member states relations with Israel arising from the findings of the crimes of apartheid and persecution.”

The group adds that the EU and member states should apply enhanced screening in its “bilateral agreements, cooperation schemes and all forms of trade and dealing with Israel.”

Maureen Clare Murphy is an associate editor of The Electronic Intifada and lives in Chicago